The dilemma of a crook

Hypothetical situation: Person A buys from Person B for $5000 a large plastic bag (one of those Glad types) filled with 100% pure marijuana. Some time after the transaction, Person A realizes that the Glad bag contains only 50% of marijuana, while the remaining 50% is oregano. In other words, Person A got screwed over.

Question: Should Person A sue Person B for dishonesty and fraud due to the fact that Person A was mislead into buying a product that did not live up to the advertised characteristics?


If your answer was no, then I foresee brilliant legal careers ahead of each and every one of you.

R.R. - Lawyer at day, teacher at night