Sunday, October 10, 2010

Conclusion


Today, on October 10th, this blog reaches a new stage of its development. Today marks one year since Eyes through the glass has come into being! Wow j'arrive pas à croire que ça fait déjà un an que je debilite des inepties sur Internet hahaha! And yes, the only reason that sentence was in French is that I liked how it sounded....which proves my point even further. But coming back to the subject on hand (yes I still have trouble staying on topic), the coming of this event has led me to evaluate exactly where I stand with this blog and what I have accomplished with it in the past year. Though, I do feel that accomplished might be too strong a word to describe what I have done with this thing. Anyway, leaving semantics aside, what I'm trying to say is that I feel like I have strayed from the initial purpose of this project of mine. For thoroughness' sake, I will quote part of my introduction (which was also my first post):

"So this blog is a place for my thoughts, my reflexions, a general conversation with my mind before I chuck myself into the psychiatric asylum, or if you will, a sort of diary since I don't really expect anyone to read through all this."

I am dying to make a comment about the last part of that sentence, but I shall refrain because this is not the time nor place for bitterness. In any case, I initially envisioned Eyes through the glass as a more reflective or poetic product. But it seems like I can't separate myself from my feelings and my frustrations and, let's be honest, there's nothing poetic about a whiny girl in her late teenage years. And there's more music here than actual reflections (and the songs might be deep sometimes, but mostly they're not). This blog is becoming too hétéroclite as the French would say. And while it represents me in the purest sense (because I can be deep, but most of the time I'm not), I need some structure and some organization. However, I do know myself and I know that I'll never be able to keep my rants out of my posts. No matter how many efforts I'll make, there will still be one in two posts containing stupidities, nonsense and whining.

And for that reason, I am creating two new blogs. One for my circuits and one for my blood pumping vessel. One that I can be proud of and which would truly be a work of art (and where I'll probably post once a month hahaha), and one where I can dump all my frustrations, my impulses and my rants (and where I'll post almost daily -_-). In a sense, I find this decision of mine ironic because, some time ago, I went to a conference where the speaker was talking about how fragmented our society is and how we separate emotions from reason and from will. And how, on the contrary, we should try to integrate every part of ourselves, rational and non-rational, into our existence. And here I am, doing the exact opposite. Blah, maybe in a year I'll create a new blog where I'll recombine everything. All I know is that right now I need a separation, maybe to help me find a focus in my life and to reconnect with the different parts of me. And for that I need structure. Maybe I'll still post here, maybe not, I can't tell. I did have a little project that I wanted to do for my 20th birthday which is coming in less than 2 months and which I might post here though.

But I guess this is pretty much it. This is goodbye. This is the start of a new beginning.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

The Breakup

Somebody please tell me
Where can I find
The final resting place
Of my poor heart.

Give an add in the paper
Call the police
Missing wife has abandoned
Her dear husband tonight.

Believed to be dead
Of too much despair
Said wife has been buried
In an unknown place.

Searches have been deployed
To find the lost grave
Husband is desperate
To have his emotions restored.

This body is empty
Since you have died
Dear heart why have you left me?
Why did you break apart?

Shocking news
For the entire world
Teenager killed herself
Leaving this note:

“Emotionless husband
I have answered your request
I can no longer bear to live
In a body that is divorced.
Here’s my solution
To your long strive
If one grave cannot be found,
Dig another one to reunite husband and wife."

Ok let me explain. No, I am not suicidal. This is a poem I wrote about three years ago (I wasn't suicidal at that point either). And I find it appropriate in the sense that it is the exact opposite of what I'm going to do. I've been ruled by my emotions for far too long and this has got to stop. I vote for a separation of mind and heart. I vote for keeping reason and logic firmly into place and for burying emotions somewhere deep underneath. This is my resolution for the next year.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Bittersweet Symphony



You know I can change, I can change
I can change, I can change
But I'm here in my mold
I am here in my mold
And I'm a million different people
From one day to the next
I can't change my mold

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Saturday, October 2, 2010

Monument historique ou logements sociaux?


Dans un article du journal Métro, on parlait du fait que l'archevêché de Montréal voulait démolir une église du quartier Hochelaga-Maisonneuve qui avait été fermée au public à cause du non-respect du code de sécurité pour construire à la place des habitations à loyer modique ou une résidence pour personnes âgées. Et pour une fois de ma vie, j'étais impressionnée avec une action de l'église catholique. Je me disais wow, on va vraiment démolir une église pour faire des logements sociaux! C'est génial!

Par contre, que vois-je dans la prochaine parution du même journal? "Le comité de sauvegarde de l'église du Très-Saint-Nom-de-Jésus est très choqué". WTF?? Les gens intéressés pourront lire l'article, mais je voulais juste souligner à quel point la situation est ridicule. Je ne me prononce pas d'habitude sur les sujets d'actualité, mais quand je vois des absurdités de ce genre je ne peux pas m'en empêcher. Donc laissez-moi exposer la situation en gros.

Il y a une église où plus personne ne va parce que ça signifierait y laisser sa vie. Et l'archevêché de Montréal veut la démolir parce que, soyons honnêtes, elle ne sert plus à rien et en plus elle coûte de l'argent à entretenir. Et le maire de l'arrondissement et je ne sais plus quel comité bidon veulent l'en empêcher parce que cette église représente supposément un monument historique (bon pas pour l'instant, mais ils veulent le classer comme tel) et qu'on ne peut pas écarter la possibilité de lui donner une seconde vie (il est aussi question d'une orgue qui vaudrait quelque chose en monnaie sentimentale).

Et tiens, tiens, vers la fin de l'article, on parle du sujet qui nous intéresse vraiment. L'argent. D'après ce qu'on dit, l'entretien de l'édifice couterait moins que le fait de déménager l'orgue (si on y tient...) et les frais de démolition qui s'élèveraient à environ 1,8 M$. Bon peut-être. Mais ce qu'ils oublient de mentionner est que si on veut restaurer l'église (pour qu'elle arrête d'être inutile...ça sert à quoi d'avoir un monument historique si on ne peut pas s'en approcher?) ça va coûter 2,6 M$. Bon bien sur, dans tout ça, on ne mentionne pas quel sera le coût de la construction des HLM ou de la résidence pour personnes âgées, ni qui supporterait ce coût. Mais, disons, disons que ce projet n'est pas rentable (ce dont je doute), alors pourquoi on ne le mentionne dès le départ? On n'a qu'à dire, écoutez pour le moment on n'a pas les fonds nécessaires pour ça et ça nous revient moins cher de juste entretenir la place jusqu'à tant qu'on trouve une autre solution. Maaaiiiissss noooonn! À la place on monte sur ses grands chevaux et on présente des projets de restauration pour qu'après les gens puissent aller écouter une orgue dans une autre église moyenâgeuse. On n'a pas assez d'églises à Montréal ou quoi? On n'a pas assez de monuments? On pourrait faire quelque chose de vraiment utile pour la société, mais à la place on s'acharne sur la culture. La culture ne sert à rien lorsqu'on n'a pas de toit pour abriter sa tête de la pluie.

Friday, October 1, 2010

1000 Suns beats 100 Suns

Ok do this little exercise and tell me if you notice anything.

First listen to The Catalyst by Linkin Park

Then listen to The Requiem also by Linkin Park



Now listen to This is War by 30 Seconds to Mars

Finally, listen to 100 Suns by the same fabulous 30 Seconds to Mars



I know right? Plus, ironically, Linkin Park's new album is called A Thousand Suns. I mean, don't get me wrong! I love both bands and I'm not pointing fingers, but this is waaaay too obvious to not be noticed. Unless, duets like these and mentions of the solar system are the newest fad in music, I don't know how else it could be explained (of course the blame would fall on Linkin Park since their album came out later....but even then, considering how much time they take to make an album, such a thing doesn't mean much).

And if I may give my personal opinion, Linkin Park did it better...