Showing posts with label law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label law. Show all posts

Thursday, March 24, 2011

The dilemma of a crook

Hypothetical situation: Person A buys from Person B for $5000 a large plastic bag (one of those Glad types) filled with 100% pure marijuana. Some time after the transaction, Person A realizes that the Glad bag contains only 50% of marijuana, while the remaining 50% is oregano. In other words, Person A got screwed over.

Question: Should Person A sue Person B for dishonesty and fraud due to the fact that Person A was mislead into buying a product that did not live up to the advertised characteristics?


If your answer was no, then I foresee brilliant legal careers ahead of each and every one of you.


R.R. - Lawyer at day, teacher at night

Friday, January 28, 2011

Constitutional right to dissent or Why I hate lawyers


I respectfully inform you that it is my constitutional right to dissent with the agreement that has been reached upon by the general assembly.

Translation?

I don't agree.

Why the hell do lawyers and judges complicate sentences and words to the point of writing half a page that doesn't mean anything?? First of all, as my "beloved" Waves teacher from CEGEP used to say "Think of the trees!!!" (though I don't care much about the trees, but I just had to plug that in). Second of all (and the main point), what is the point of communicating something if no one (except your own breed of language twisters) can understand a word you're saying? You literally need a law degree just to translate their gibberish into common mortal language. And maybe you think I'm exaggerating, but let me give you an example (yeah the introductory sentence was just me trying and failing miserably to imitate my law teacher). It's a long quote, but bear with me.

"The conventional approach of categorizing discrimination as “direct” or
'adverse effect' discrimination should be replaced by a unified approach for several
reasons. First, the distinction between a standard that is discriminatory on its face and
a neutral standard that is discriminatory in its effect is difficult to justify: few cases can
be so neatly characterized. Second, it is disconcerting that different remedies are
available depending on the stream into which a malleable initial inquiry shunts the
analysis."

And this actually goes on for over half a page. And do you know what it means? Basically there are 2 types of discrimination, but we don't care about them because the judges have decided that it's not important to make a distinction. Two lines! Vs Half a page!! And that's not even the worst part. Just look at the last sentence of the quote. What does it mean?? I have no freakin' clue!! And I don't need to!! Cause it doesn't change anything!!! And these are sentences from the Supreme Court (therefore not that relevant to you and I). But the Civil Code or contracts or the gazillion other Acts that they have and which relate to us for the simple reason that we live in society and we are bound by regulations... Gah, I get a headache after reading just one page. Strangely enough, even my book on quantum mechanics is easier to understand than this.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

It's always good to have a PhD

"-Lucky for him, his daddy had a PhD. Do you know what a PhD is?
-An advanced university degree or a doctoral degree?
-Wrong. A PhD stands for 'Papa has Dough'!"

Hahaha voir que c'est ça que j'apprends dans mes cours de droit! Bah, pas juste ça, mais c'est surtout de ça que je me suis souvenue... oui, il y a le vieux monsieur juif qui voulait faire sa mini cabane de bois dans son balcon pour pouvoir prier à Dieu et qui est allé à la Cour Suprême du Canada pour se battre pour son droit de le faire... oui, il y a le monsieur qui a poursuivi le Premier Ministre ET Procureur Général Duplessis et qui a ruiné sa vie juste pour le principe de faire justice (bah je pense qu'il était aussi intéressé par l'argent dans sa poursuite, mais ça, il l'a pas vraiment eu)... oui il y a la Charte des droits et des libertés du Québec avec son fameux Article 3 qui te donne tous les droits du monde, juste pour te limiter par la suite avec l'Article 9.1 qui met le bien-être de la société québécoise avant tes libertés personelles.

BUT PhD!!! God that's priceless hahaha!!